Listen closely. I'm going to tell you how you can change your life.
Chances are, we've all heard that one before. It's a salesman's pitch, meant to play off our latent insecurities while evoking hopeful wonderment. Despite the statement's banality, to many, it's an irresistible call. Even the skeptical can be enticed. After all, there's no harm in listening... But if you turn away, you could miss out on something spectacular, transformational, or even revolutionary.
And when you listen, that's when you hear about a new dietary solution that could shake the nation from its heavy predicament, and help you get fitter and healthier than you've ever been before. This plan actually works!
Or, you might instead hear about faith, and how it's the only path to enlightenment and salvation.
In fact, the two are almost interchangeable. That's because nutrition is actually very similar to cult-like religion.
For starters, both cults and diets profess to have "answers" and impart benefits that will irrevocably change your life for the better. Veganism's pitch isn't very unlike Scientology's. Caveman Diet's isn't all that different from certain sects of Evangelical Baptism:
"The Caveman Power Diet increases energy, the ability to burn fat, and
gets you in touch with your natural instincts. It's not just a way to
lose weight, it's a healthy approach to making your body indestructable [sic]."
Indestructible? That's a rather other-worldly claim.
In the same way that cults produce zealots, nutrition produces fanatics. That's because personal experience frequently shapes the views of followers. A person who loses 100 pounds feasting on red meat and bacon can be as fervent
and fiery about their beloved diet as a follower who just met a charismatic cult leader.
Personal experience is very powerful, for it easily can morph into passionate, firmly fixed belief. As nutrition writer Jack Challem pointedly stated at Psychology Today:
In anthropology, the term "belief system" is usually used to describe
a religion. And when it comes to nutrition, many scientists and
consumers are so wedded to their beliefs that they're not interested in
adjusting their beliefs in response to new scientific findings.
But still, Challem writes, "They're just beliefs. And having millions of adherents or thousands of
experts repeat the same mantras doesn't make these beliefs truer." In other words, nutrition plans, just like religious cults commonly eschew science and reality.
can't invalidate the idea, well, you may just have something.
"...the wackier areas of nutrition... use the exact
opposite technique," the blogger continues. "It is about coming up with an idea, looking for (or
making up) evidence to support it, ignoring evidence that contradicts it
and reacting defensively to any who challenge your idea."
With no shortage of opinions and interest revolving around diet and nutrition, you might think that more would be conclusively known. Sadly, there isn't. Oh there are a few things we can claim with some certainty, like that you shouldn't imbibe sugary soft drinks in excess, or that eating a diet rich in organic foods isn't necessarily healthier. But on a host of other nutritional topics -- such as low-carbohydrate diets, egg consumption, and saturated fat intake -- more randomized controlled trials and more systematic reviews are sorely needed.
Until more quality evidence materializes, nutrition -- like cult-like religion -- will remain in the realm of belief, and the proselytizing will invariably continue.