January 4, 2013

Health Journalism Often Wrong

David Freedman, Columbia Journalism Review


AP Photo

In late 2011, in a nearly 6,000-word article in The New York Times Magazine, health writer Tara Parker-Pope laid out the scientific evidence that maintaining weight loss is a nearly impossible task—something that, in the words of one obesity scientist she quotes, only “rare individuals” can accomplish.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Diet, science journalism, health, weight loss

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

December 29, 2012
Sci-Writers Disregard Science for Politics
Alex Berezow, Pacific Standard
Any book that touches upon politics almost automatically angers half of the American public, regardless of what is written inside of it. It takes a special person—an objective, open-minded and self-critical one—to read and... more ››
December 27, 2012
Why So Many Weight Loss Resolutions Fail
Cameron English, PolicyMic
Each year many Americans follow a predictable and unfortunate pattern. Between Thanksgiving and Christmas, they gorge themselves on delicious but unhealthy holiday food. Then, come January 1, they swear off their poor eating... more ››
December 28, 2012
Is Sugar the Next Tobacco?
Elizabeth Weil, Pacific Standard
Among the least likely viral megahits on YouTube is a 90-minute lecture by the food scold and pediatric endocrinologist Robert Lustig, entitled “Sugar: The Bitter Truth.” He delivers it in a windowless room at the Osher... more ››
January 3, 2013
Dr. Oz's Miraculous Medical Malarkey
J. Belluz & S. Hoffman, Slate
As people were getting ready for the holiday season and its accompanying waist expansion late last year, Dr. Mehmet Oz let viewers of his TV show in on a timely little secret. “Everybody wants to know what’s the... more ››
December 29, 2012
Want to Lose a Lot of Weight? Go to Mars.
Ben Burress, KQED
How do you feel today? Heavy as a ton of lead, or a ton of feathers? Light on your feet, or dragging on the ground? It probably depends on a lot of things, most particularly your present physical state, and possibly on a pound... more ››