November 26, 2012

'Neuro Doubters' Help Take Out the Neurotrash

Alissa Quart, New York Times


AP Photo

THIS fall, science writers have made sport of yet another instance of bad neuroscience. The culprit this time is Naomi Wolf; her new book, “Vagina,” has been roundly drubbed for misrepresenting the brain and neurochemicals like dopamine and oxytocin.

Earlier in the year, Chris Mooney raised similar ire with the book “The Republican Brain,” which claims that Republicans are genetically different from — and, many readers deduced, lesser to — Democrats.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Science Journalism, Media Hype, Neuroscience

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

October 22, 2013
How to Lose Your Credibility as a Science Writer
Cliff Mass, Weather Blog
Last month, the Seattle Times ran a glossy, three-part story called "Sea Change: The Pacific's Perilous Turn" where it discussed the impacts of ocean acidification resulting from increasing CO2 in the atmosphere. The article made... more ››
October 19, 2013
It's Not Left & Right Brain. It's Bottom and Top.
Kosslyn & Miller, WSJ
Who hasn't heard that people are either left-brained or right-brained—either analytical and logical or artistic and intuitive, based on the relative "strengths" of the brain's two hemispheres? How often do we hear... more ››
October 18, 2013
'Scientific American' Shaken by Sexual Harassment
L. Helmuth, Slate
I take back every bad thing I have ever said about Twitter. It’s fast, responsive, and efficient, and it’s the medium of record when gossip breaks. Like pretty much every other science journalist in the world,... more ››