November 26, 2012

'Neuro Doubters' Help Take Out the Neurotrash

Alissa Quart, New York Times


AP Photo

THIS fall, science writers have made sport of yet another instance of bad neuroscience. The culprit this time is Naomi Wolf; her new book, “Vagina,” has been roundly drubbed for misrepresenting the brain and neurochemicals like dopamine and oxytocin.

Earlier in the year, Chris Mooney raised similar ire with the book “The Republican Brain,” which claims that Republicans are genetically different from — and, many readers deduced, lesser to — Democrats.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: science journalism, media hype, neuroscience

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

One of the biggest puzzles in neuroscience is how our brains encode thoughts, such as perceptions and memories, at the cellular level. Some evidence suggests that ensembles of neurons represent each unique piece of... more ››
November 16, 2012
Bridging the Fiscal Cliff Through Brain Science
David Rock, Huff Post
History is often made when adversaries with well-established biases overcome expectations to find common ground: Ronald Reagan negotiating arms reduction with Mikhail Gorbachev, Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin signing a peace... more ››
November 13, 2012
Neuroscientists: The Next Architects?
Emily Badger, Pacific Standard
ARCHITECTS HAVE BEEN talking for years about “biophilic” design, “evidence based” design, design informed by the work of psychologists. But last May, at the profession’s annual convention, John Zeisel and fellow... more ››