November 9, 2012

Nate Silver's Election Odds Were Wrong

Buzz Skyline, Physics Central


AP Photo

Nate Silver, founder and chief blogger at fivethirtyeight is an amazing political analyst who appears to have the ability to predict election outcomes almost perfectly. Despite the praise being heaped upon him by so many people who, like me, spent hours and hours reading his posts and studying his plots, I have to tell you I'm shocked at just how wrong his probabilities seemingly turned out to have been in the end.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: election 2012, predictions, statistics, probability

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

November 6, 2012
The Greatest Scientific Experiment on Earth
Ross Pomeroy, RCScience
Nearly twelve score years ago, dozens of courageous statesmen convened to both define and solve a problem that had plagued mankind since the dawn of our species: How best shall a nation of free and independent human beings... more ››
November 5, 2012
How Accurate Are All Those Polls, Really?
Hank Campbell, Science 2.0
Nate Silver, a sports statistician, made waves when he accurately projected the results of the presidential election in 2008.  So a few days go when he predicted that President Obama was 75% likely to win when polls only... more ››
November 6, 2012
Why Betting Markets, Polls Don't Agree
Jesse Emspak, Discovery News
According to election polls, the presidential race is neck and neck. According to election polls, our country is split right down the middle. According to election polls, it's anyone's guess who will be the next president of... more ››
October 27, 2012
The Difficult Science of Predicting the Future
Ethan Siegel, ScienceBlogs
What’s going to happen next? It’s perhaps the most important thing to know if we want to be prepared for practically anything in our lives. And without even thinking about it, most of us are actually very good at this in a... more ››