November 29, 2011

Does Peer Review Improve Science?

Emma Veitch, PLoS Blogs


AP Photo

There’s a lot of nay-saying about peer review out there – it’s messy, inadequate, timeconsuming, boring, and nobody knows what it’s supposed to do anyway. But despite that, peer review is widely regarded as indispensable by many – including bodies such as the UK Government’s Select Committee...

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Peer Review

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

October 9, 2013
The Cowardice of Online Anonymity
Steve Caplan, Guardian
Anonymity plays an essential role in the scientific review process. But for many online commenters, social disinhibition leads to repulsive and cowardly behaviour. more ››
October 4, 2013
Open Access 'Sting Operation' Was Flawed
Martin Eve, Conversation UK
In a sting operation, John Bohannon, a correspondent of Science, claims to have exposed dodgy open access journals. His argument seems to be that, because of their business model, some journals are biased toward accepting... more ››