November 16, 2011

Importance of Self-Criticism in Science

Michael Brown, The Conversation


AP Photo

Scientists and the public can have very different views of scientific debates.

Are vaccines responsible for increased rates of autism? Does increasing carbon dioxide lead to a rise in global temperatures? For most scientists, these debates have been resolved, but they remain very visible in the public arena.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Scientific Research, Scientific Journals, Peer Review

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

October 4, 2013
Open Access 'Sting Operation' Was Flawed
Martin Eve, Conversation UK
In a sting operation, John Bohannon, a correspondent of Science, claims to have exposed dodgy open access journals. His argument seems to be that, because of their business model, some journals are biased toward accepting... more ››
October 10, 2013
Scientists Poor at Identifying Important Research
Francie Diep, PopSci
Maybe you shouldn't put too much stock in what four out of five dentists say? Scientists, even experts in the same field, don't agree on which research studies are the most important, a new study (of course) found. On one hand,... more ››
October 9, 2013
The Cowardice of Online Anonymity
Steve Caplan, Guardian
Anonymity plays an essential role in the scientific review process. But for many online commenters, social disinhibition leads to repulsive and cowardly behaviour. more ››
October 2, 2013
Government Shuts Down, Microbes Win
Emily Willingham, Forbes
The shutdown of the US government has many repercussions that are almost immeasurable and hit US citizens from every direction. But a quartet of them stands out for their potential to pose a threat to public health because... more ››